The protection of children’s rights is a core component of both Italian and European legal traditions, and has gradually been extended to address new challenges that have emerged—among others—in the so-called Digital Era (see GDPR). Nevertheless, technological evolution continues to generate new threats to children, some of which arise from unexpected directions. One such threat is the phenomenon known as “sharenting”, the rapidly growing practice of parents sharing images and information about their children online, sometimes even before birth (e.g., ultrasound images). This trend has raised concerns and has become a subject of study for scholars in the social sciences, and more recently for legal scholars as well. The growing apprehensions stem from the many negative consequences of sharenting on children's rights. First, it directly affects multiple fundamental rights (privacy, image, identity), all of which converge in the broader right to a child’s self- determination. Second, it poses severe security risks, as it exposes the children involved to threats associated with cybercrimes and the child exploitation market. Parallel to the phenomenon of sharenting, another issue has emerged with equal force—the so-called “baby influencers”. While similar in nature, this phenomenon differs in legal terms, as it falls under the category of child labour yet remains largely unregulated in most European legal systems (with the notable exception of France). This essay aims to explore these phenomena and the associated risks, not merely in terms of the recognition of children’s rights but, more importantly, their actual effectiveness, with a particular focus on the Italian context. In Italy, on one hand, lower courts are increasingly faced with requests for injunctions and damages; on the other, multiple legislative proposals have been submitted to Parliament in an effort to address the issue through regulation.

PROTECTED BY WHOM? CHILDREN’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE AGE OF SHARENTING. A CONSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE FROM ITALY

Bergonzini C.
2025-01-01

Abstract

The protection of children’s rights is a core component of both Italian and European legal traditions, and has gradually been extended to address new challenges that have emerged—among others—in the so-called Digital Era (see GDPR). Nevertheless, technological evolution continues to generate new threats to children, some of which arise from unexpected directions. One such threat is the phenomenon known as “sharenting”, the rapidly growing practice of parents sharing images and information about their children online, sometimes even before birth (e.g., ultrasound images). This trend has raised concerns and has become a subject of study for scholars in the social sciences, and more recently for legal scholars as well. The growing apprehensions stem from the many negative consequences of sharenting on children's rights. First, it directly affects multiple fundamental rights (privacy, image, identity), all of which converge in the broader right to a child’s self- determination. Second, it poses severe security risks, as it exposes the children involved to threats associated with cybercrimes and the child exploitation market. Parallel to the phenomenon of sharenting, another issue has emerged with equal force—the so-called “baby influencers”. While similar in nature, this phenomenon differs in legal terms, as it falls under the category of child labour yet remains largely unregulated in most European legal systems (with the notable exception of France). This essay aims to explore these phenomena and the associated risks, not merely in terms of the recognition of children’s rights but, more importantly, their actual effectiveness, with a particular focus on the Italian context. In Italy, on one hand, lower courts are increasingly faced with requests for injunctions and damages; on the other, multiple legislative proposals have been submitted to Parliament in an effort to address the issue through regulation.
2025
Editoriale Scientifica
Internazionale
https://www.ijpl.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/18.-BERGONZINI_Protected-by-Whom.pdf
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025_BERGONZINI_IJPL_Protected-by-Whom.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Saggio integrale
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 324.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
324.91 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/368850
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact