This paper analyses whether negation, as a modifier of degree, leads to different outcomes based on the psychophysical structure of the polar dimension along which the shift produced by the negator “not” occurs. In three experiments, the interpretation of negation in association with four different types of dimension was analysed. The types comprised: (1) strongly asymmetrical dimensions, topologically defined (in terms of the characteristics of Pole a/intermediates/Pole b) as unbounded range/no intermediates/point (e.g., open-closed); (2) moderately asymmetrical dimensions, topologically defined as unbounded range/range of intermediates/bounded range (e.g., wide-narrow); (3) slightly symmetrical dimensions, topologically defined as point/range of intermediates/point (e.g., full-empty); and (4) symmetrical dimensions, topologically defined as bounded range/point/bounded range (e.g., above-below). Results showed that the function of negation varies depending on which type of dimension is involved. These results are discussed in relation to previous literature, where the definition of various types of antonyms was based on the applicability of different lexical modifiers of degree.

Negation and psychological dimensions.

BIANCHI, IVANA;
2011-01-01

Abstract

This paper analyses whether negation, as a modifier of degree, leads to different outcomes based on the psychophysical structure of the polar dimension along which the shift produced by the negator “not” occurs. In three experiments, the interpretation of negation in association with four different types of dimension was analysed. The types comprised: (1) strongly asymmetrical dimensions, topologically defined (in terms of the characteristics of Pole a/intermediates/Pole b) as unbounded range/no intermediates/point (e.g., open-closed); (2) moderately asymmetrical dimensions, topologically defined as unbounded range/range of intermediates/bounded range (e.g., wide-narrow); (3) slightly symmetrical dimensions, topologically defined as point/range of intermediates/point (e.g., full-empty); and (4) symmetrical dimensions, topologically defined as bounded range/point/bounded range (e.g., above-below). Results showed that the function of negation varies depending on which type of dimension is involved. These results are discussed in relation to previous literature, where the definition of various types of antonyms was based on the applicability of different lexical modifiers of degree.
2011
Psychology Press
Internazionale
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a938713783~frm=titlelink
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JCP_ NON_Corrected version copia.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 2.48 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.48 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/61781
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact