This article develops the Apology Model (AM), a theoretical framework for explaining community-based, customary systems of conflict resolution in which apologetic acts and their acceptance operate as socially regulated transactions. Rather than treating apology as a private emotion or a purely linguistic formula, AM conceptualizes it as an institutional sequence through which a wrong is made publicly intelligible, responsibility is allocated, and social closure is produced through recognizable uptake. The framework is specified and examined through an in-depth analysis of the Kalderash (căldărari) Roma justice system in Romania. Drawing on fieldwork-based interviews, the article examines how disputes are settled across multiple arenas, including the Kris (community court), regulated fighting, and mechanisms such as gossip and avoidance. Particular attention is devoted to the ways reconciliation becomes publicly certified and durable, often through ritualized re-acceptance gestures and material devices (including payments) that signal accountability without reducing forgiveness to a market exchange. While the Kalderash case is the primary empirical focus, the article argues that AM provides a portable analytic lens for comparative research on informal justice, especially where honor, reputation, and membership are at stake.

Ritual Apologies: The Kalderash Conflict Resolution System

Mazzola, Riccardo;
2026-01-01

Abstract

This article develops the Apology Model (AM), a theoretical framework for explaining community-based, customary systems of conflict resolution in which apologetic acts and their acceptance operate as socially regulated transactions. Rather than treating apology as a private emotion or a purely linguistic formula, AM conceptualizes it as an institutional sequence through which a wrong is made publicly intelligible, responsibility is allocated, and social closure is produced through recognizable uptake. The framework is specified and examined through an in-depth analysis of the Kalderash (căldărari) Roma justice system in Romania. Drawing on fieldwork-based interviews, the article examines how disputes are settled across multiple arenas, including the Kris (community court), regulated fighting, and mechanisms such as gossip and avoidance. Particular attention is devoted to the ways reconciliation becomes publicly certified and durable, often through ritualized re-acceptance gestures and material devices (including payments) that signal accountability without reducing forgiveness to a market exchange. While the Kalderash case is the primary empirical focus, the article argues that AM provides a portable analytic lens for comparative research on informal justice, especially where honor, reputation, and membership are at stake.
2026
Milano University Press
Nazionale
https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/sociologiadeldiritto/article/view/31942/26669
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
7.Mazzola.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 493.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
493.04 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/378750
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact