Format identification is crucial for digital preservation, yet because of its complexities it is inconsistently implemented in our workflows. This paper shares findings from the “Registries of Good Practice” project and preservation practices collated by the Preservation Registries Special Interest Group. Analysing diverse institutional workflows, we demonstrate how preservation goals, institutional capacities, and specific preservation stages dictated identification requirements. This paper emphasizes the need to connect disparate practices and establish evidence-based improvements for format identification.
Format identification in context: patterns & hazards in digital preservation workflows
Allegrezza, Stefano;
2025-01-01
Abstract
Format identification is crucial for digital preservation, yet because of its complexities it is inconsistently implemented in our workflows. This paper shares findings from the “Registries of Good Practice” project and preservation practices collated by the Preservation Registries Special Interest Group. Analysing diverse institutional workflows, we demonstrate how preservation goals, institutional capacities, and specific preservation stages dictated identification requirements. This paper emphasizes the need to connect disparate practices and establish evidence-based improvements for format identification.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ALLEGREZZA et al_iPRES2025_LP_Format_Identification_Patterns_&_Hazards.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: PDF Editoriale
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
303.11 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
303.11 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


