This reflection compares the predominantly political interpretations offered by Hannah Arendt and Günther Anders of some of Franz Kafka’s writings. It is a comparison that points to a rather different declination of the topic of exclusion / extraneity by the two philosophers towards Kafka’s work. This analysis on the pro and contra of Kafka that Arendt and Anders elaborate at different times allows us to understand the limits of concepts and lexicons typical of contemporary democracies such as inclusion and tolerance by critiquing them radically.
Kafka pro e contro: profili critici dell’appartenere
N. Mattucci
2025-01-01
Abstract
This reflection compares the predominantly political interpretations offered by Hannah Arendt and Günther Anders of some of Franz Kafka’s writings. It is a comparison that points to a rather different declination of the topic of exclusion / extraneity by the two philosophers towards Kafka’s work. This analysis on the pro and contra of Kafka that Arendt and Anders elaborate at different times allows us to understand the limits of concepts and lexicons typical of contemporary democracies such as inclusion and tolerance by critiquing them radically.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
3. Mattucci_Kafka pro e contro_.docx.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
407.55 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
407.55 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


