An accurate analysis of Marx’s early works reveals the pivotal role of ontology in defining his critical research project, which culminated with the publication of Capital. By reassessing Marx’s critical project in such terms, a careful review of the ontological conceptions of contemporary heterodox economics becomes possible, revealing a paradoxical situation. By focusing exclusively on mainstream’s logical inconsistencies, a branch of heterodox economics converged towards the same ontological assumptions as mainstream e c o n o m i c s . These economists fall into the “axiomatic habitus” of mimicking, at times unconsciously, the same stances as mainstream economics. By contrast, segments of mainstream e c o n o m i c s ( New Political Economy; NeoInstitutionalist Economics) are more aware of the nature of the social reality to be investigated, introducing an axiomatized history within their framework. A careful review of Karl Marx’s ontological rupture then becomes an inescapable reference in order to amend both heterodox and orthodox economics, challenging the increasing insularity of our discipline.
From ontological orientation to axiomatic habitus? An historical reappraisal of contemporary political economy from a Marxian angle
LAMPA R;
2020-01-01
Abstract
An accurate analysis of Marx’s early works reveals the pivotal role of ontology in defining his critical research project, which culminated with the publication of Capital. By reassessing Marx’s critical project in such terms, a careful review of the ontological conceptions of contemporary heterodox economics becomes possible, revealing a paradoxical situation. By focusing exclusively on mainstream’s logical inconsistencies, a branch of heterodox economics converged towards the same ontological assumptions as mainstream e c o n o m i c s . These economists fall into the “axiomatic habitus” of mimicking, at times unconsciously, the same stances as mainstream economics. By contrast, segments of mainstream e c o n o m i c s ( New Political Economy; NeoInstitutionalist Economics) are more aware of the nature of the social reality to be investigated, introducing an axiomatized history within their framework. A careful review of Karl Marx’s ontological rupture then becomes an inescapable reference in order to amend both heterodox and orthodox economics, challenging the increasing insularity of our discipline.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Lampa_2020.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
437.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
437.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.