Progressive scholars can easily point out that present neoliberal policies fail to achieve the goals they claim to pursue (output and financial stability) and determine unacceptable income and wealth inequality as well as social debasement. They find it more difficult to conceive of an alternative. What is at issue is not just the identification of some set of technically viable policy measures. Policy determines institutional changes that involve not only the economy but society as a whole. An alternative to Neoliberalism must, therefore, deal not only with its strictly economic implications but with the societal changes that the latter determined. A standard approach in this respect is to focus on interdisciplinarity. While it allows to take account of changes that lie beyond the economy, this approach implicitly assumes that the structure of society-thus the disciplinary boundaries that relate to it-is given. A more interesting approach that draws on the institutionalist tradition, is an open-systems one, which allows for overall-rather than merely additive-change.

“Talkin’ ‘bout a Revolution” or, What about Institutional Change?

Ramazzotti P.
2022-01-01

Abstract

Progressive scholars can easily point out that present neoliberal policies fail to achieve the goals they claim to pursue (output and financial stability) and determine unacceptable income and wealth inequality as well as social debasement. They find it more difficult to conceive of an alternative. What is at issue is not just the identification of some set of technically viable policy measures. Policy determines institutional changes that involve not only the economy but society as a whole. An alternative to Neoliberalism must, therefore, deal not only with its strictly economic implications but with the societal changes that the latter determined. A standard approach in this respect is to focus on interdisciplinarity. While it allows to take account of changes that lie beyond the economy, this approach implicitly assumes that the structure of society-thus the disciplinary boundaries that relate to it-is given. A more interesting approach that draws on the institutionalist tradition, is an open-systems one, which allows for overall-rather than merely additive-change.
2022
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Internazionale
https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/mjei20
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
final version.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 137.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
137.65 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/306719
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact