The paper focuses on one of the most urgent risks of artificial intelligence, and more specifically of algorithmic decision-making (ADM), that is, the risk of being unfair. In the first section we provide an overview of the discus- sion on fairness in ADM and show its shortcomings; in the second section we pursue an ethical inquiry into the concept of fairness, and identify its main dimensions and components, drawing insight from a renewed reflection on respect, which goes beyond the idea of equal respect to include respect for particular individuals too. In the third section we show how our conceptual re-elaboration of fairness can help identify the criteria that ought to steer the ethical design of ADM-based systems to make them really fair.
Equità e decisioni algoritmiche
B. Giovanola;S. Tiribelli
2022-01-01
Abstract
The paper focuses on one of the most urgent risks of artificial intelligence, and more specifically of algorithmic decision-making (ADM), that is, the risk of being unfair. In the first section we provide an overview of the discus- sion on fairness in ADM and show its shortcomings; in the second section we pursue an ethical inquiry into the concept of fairness, and identify its main dimensions and components, drawing insight from a renewed reflection on respect, which goes beyond the idea of equal respect to include respect for particular individuals too. In the third section we show how our conceptual re-elaboration of fairness can help identify the criteria that ought to steer the ethical design of ADM-based systems to make them really fair.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2022_Giovanola-Tiribelli_Teoria.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
208.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
208.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.