The paper analyses the judgment issued by the Italian Court of Auditors regarding the 2019 financial statement of Sicily (“rendiconto”). The Court’s ruling is of great significance in the current debate on the nature and function of the Court of Auditors’ control in this matter (so-called “giudizio di parifica”), reshaped after the constitutional amendment of 2012. It is argued that the conflict of attributions raised by the Region Sicily after this judgment may offer the Italian Constitutional Court a chance to clarify the role of the Court of Auditors and the leeway of autonomy of the Regions.
« Ceci ce n’est pas une pipe », ovvero sulla “ritrovata” natura giurisdizionale del giudizio di parificazione
Menegus, G
2022-01-01
Abstract
The paper analyses the judgment issued by the Italian Court of Auditors regarding the 2019 financial statement of Sicily (“rendiconto”). The Court’s ruling is of great significance in the current debate on the nature and function of the Court of Auditors’ control in this matter (so-called “giudizio di parifica”), reshaped after the constitutional amendment of 2012. It is argued that the conflict of attributions raised by the Region Sicily after this judgment may offer the Italian Constitutional Court a chance to clarify the role of the Court of Auditors and the leeway of autonomy of the Regions.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Menegus - Bilancio Comunità Persona - 1:2022.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
675.06 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
675.06 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.