This essay deals with the countermajoritarian dilemma, examining how the judicial review of legislation developed in the US constitutional experience. Since the beginning, the power of the courts to declare statute laws unconstitutional has been highly debated by legal scholars and in the political arena. Taking into specific account Jefferson’s view on that issue, this essay analyses the roots and the development paths of the decentralised model of constitutional adjudication, dealing with the US Supreme Court’s case law in the nineteenth and twentieth century.
Thomas Jefferson, Marbury v. Madison e il countermajoritarian dilemma
Barbisan
2021-01-01
Abstract
This essay deals with the countermajoritarian dilemma, examining how the judicial review of legislation developed in the US constitutional experience. Since the beginning, the power of the courts to declare statute laws unconstitutional has been highly debated by legal scholars and in the political arena. Taking into specific account Jefferson’s view on that issue, this essay analyses the roots and the development paths of the decentralised model of constitutional adjudication, dealing with the US Supreme Court’s case law in the nineteenth and twentieth century.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Thomas Jefferson (Diritticomparati).pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
316.58 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
316.58 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.