This essay deals with the countermajoritarian dilemma, examining how the judicial review of legislation developed in the US constitutional experience. Since the beginning, the power of the courts to declare statute laws unconstitutional has been highly debated by legal scholars and in the political arena. Taking into specific account Jefferson’s view on that issue, this essay analyses the roots and the development paths of the decentralised model of constitutional adjudication, dealing with the US Supreme Court’s case law in the nineteenth and twentieth century.

Thomas Jefferson, Marbury v. Madison e il countermajoritarian dilemma

Barbisan
2021-01-01

Abstract

This essay deals with the countermajoritarian dilemma, examining how the judicial review of legislation developed in the US constitutional experience. Since the beginning, the power of the courts to declare statute laws unconstitutional has been highly debated by legal scholars and in the political arena. Taking into specific account Jefferson’s view on that issue, this essay analyses the roots and the development paths of the decentralised model of constitutional adjudication, dealing with the US Supreme Court’s case law in the nineteenth and twentieth century.
2021
Andrea Buratti, Giuseppe Martinico, Oreste Pollicino, Giorgio Repetto, Raffaele Torino
Nazionale
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Thomas Jefferson (Diritticomparati).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 316.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
316.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/290898
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact