The paper deals with the relationship between consent of the people and other forms of legitimation in mediaeval political thought. It focuses in particular on authors who adopta a "pluralistic" approach to the sources of legitimation. The analysis concerns four authors, Manegold of Lautenbahc, Vincet of Beauvais, Giles of Rome and Hervé de Nédellec. They belong to different moments of the development of medieval political thoughty and don't use the same political language. They concur in the persuasions that consent must be taken into consideration as a source of legitimation, but alone doesn't account for the complexity of the phenomenon

Non solum ex consensu populi. Sondaggi sul raporto tra consenso e altre forme di legittimazione del potere nel pensiero politico medievale (secc. XI-XIV).

Roberto Lambertini
2020-01-01

Abstract

The paper deals with the relationship between consent of the people and other forms of legitimation in mediaeval political thought. It focuses in particular on authors who adopta a "pluralistic" approach to the sources of legitimation. The analysis concerns four authors, Manegold of Lautenbahc, Vincet of Beauvais, Giles of Rome and Hervé de Nédellec. They belong to different moments of the development of medieval political thoughty and don't use the same political language. They concur in the persuasions that consent must be taken into consideration as a source of legitimation, but alone doesn't account for the complexity of the phenomenon
2020
Il Mulino
Internazionale
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Lambertini_Non-solum-ex_2020.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 241.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
241.87 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/277978
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact