This contribution deals with the mercy’s power (Article 87 of the Italian Constitution). The judgement of the Constitutional Court (No. 200, 2006) has changed by way of interpretation a constitutional custom dating back to the time of the Albertine Statute. The decision of the Court has attributed exclusively to the Head of State the right to exercise this power, thus removing any political responsibility from the act, and has made this institution solely devoted to humanitarian purposes, thus denying the political and multi-functional nature of the act of granting pardon. The marginality of the institution has not caused a change in the form of Government, however it has brought to light a series of issues and problems connected to the relationship between powers, particularly to the role and function of the Head of State, its relationship with the executive power, and the relationship between executive and judicial power.
Il contributo affronta il potere di fare grazia (art. 87 Cost). La sentenza della Corte costituzionale (n. 200, 2006) ha modificato in via interpretativa una consuetudine costituzionale risalente alla vigenza dello Statuto albertino. La decisione della Consulta ha attribuito in via esclusiva al Capo dello Stato la titolarità, lasciando l’atto senza una responsabilità politica, ed ha funzionalizzato l’istituto al solo scopo umanitario, negando la natura politica e polifunzionale dell’atto di grazia. La marginalità dell’istituto non ha comportato un cambiamento della forma di Governo tuttavia ha portato alla luce una serie di questioni e problemi legati al rapporto tra poteri. In particolare il ruolo e la funzione del Capo dello Stato, il suo rapporto con l’esecutivo e di quest’ultimo con il giudiziario
Testi e contesti del potere di fare grazia (1848-2018) … to be continued
monica stronati
2018-01-01
Abstract
This contribution deals with the mercy’s power (Article 87 of the Italian Constitution). The judgement of the Constitutional Court (No. 200, 2006) has changed by way of interpretation a constitutional custom dating back to the time of the Albertine Statute. The decision of the Court has attributed exclusively to the Head of State the right to exercise this power, thus removing any political responsibility from the act, and has made this institution solely devoted to humanitarian purposes, thus denying the political and multi-functional nature of the act of granting pardon. The marginality of the institution has not caused a change in the form of Government, however it has brought to light a series of issues and problems connected to the relationship between powers, particularly to the role and function of the Head of State, its relationship with the executive power, and the relationship between executive and judicial power.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Stronati_Testi-contesti-potere_2018.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
93.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
93.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.