This chapter develops the “Apology Model” as a theoretical framework for interpreting informal conflict resolution in Northern Albania. Drawing on scholarship on Albanian customary law and discussions with current and former members of Operazione Colomba, it reconstructs a three-stage process structured around loss of honor, mediation, and ritualized apology. The analysis argues that apology is not confined to a single speech act. Its constituent elements are distributed across truces, attendance at the victim’s funeral, symbolic withdrawal, blood-money payments, reconciliation banquets, and blood-brotherhood rituals. Together, these practices publicly restore the honor of the offended family group (fis) and allow forgiveness to operate as an honor-enhancing alternative to revenge. The Northern Albanian case also reveals two features that distinguish this model from many contemporary accounts of restorative justice. First, mediators are impartial between the parties but not neutral as to outcome: they direct them toward reconciliation by drawing on social authority and the background threat of renewed violence. Second, reconciliation is collective and “choreographic”: public ritual binds the fis and establishes peace even when individual participants’ beliefs or emotions do not correspond to their prescribed actions. The Apology Model therefore challenges representations of the Kanun as a purely retributive system and offers a culturally sensitive framework for comparing informal justice practices beyond Albania.
The Apology Model of Conflict Resolution: Insights from Northern Albanian Informal Justice
Riccardo Mazzola
2026-01-01
Abstract
This chapter develops the “Apology Model” as a theoretical framework for interpreting informal conflict resolution in Northern Albania. Drawing on scholarship on Albanian customary law and discussions with current and former members of Operazione Colomba, it reconstructs a three-stage process structured around loss of honor, mediation, and ritualized apology. The analysis argues that apology is not confined to a single speech act. Its constituent elements are distributed across truces, attendance at the victim’s funeral, symbolic withdrawal, blood-money payments, reconciliation banquets, and blood-brotherhood rituals. Together, these practices publicly restore the honor of the offended family group (fis) and allow forgiveness to operate as an honor-enhancing alternative to revenge. The Northern Albanian case also reveals two features that distinguish this model from many contemporary accounts of restorative justice. First, mediators are impartial between the parties but not neutral as to outcome: they direct them toward reconciliation by drawing on social authority and the background threat of renewed violence. Second, reconciliation is collective and “choreographic”: public ritual binds the fis and establishes peace even when individual participants’ beliefs or emotions do not correspond to their prescribed actions. The Apology Model therefore challenges representations of the Kanun as a purely retributive system and offers a culturally sensitive framework for comparing informal justice practices beyond Albania.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mazz_ApologyAlbania 14.17.14.docx
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
70.31 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
70.31 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


