This paper focuses on aspects related to intertextuality and multisensoriality as in one of Philostratos’ Imagines on Dodona. The aim is to identify the meaning of the text through analysis of the multisensory dimension which is very prominent and to demonstrate that the statue of Echo is an invention rather than a real statue in the sanctuary and a ‘hyperreal representation, in which the sign, described as real, is without an original referent’, according to the definition by Baudrillard.
Intertestualità, ipertestualità e multisensorialità nelle Εἰκόνες di Filostrato Maggiore
Piccinini, J.
2023-01-01
Abstract
This paper focuses on aspects related to intertextuality and multisensoriality as in one of Philostratos’ Imagines on Dodona. The aim is to identify the meaning of the text through analysis of the multisensory dimension which is very prominent and to demonstrate that the statue of Echo is an invention rather than a real statue in the sanctuary and a ‘hyperreal representation, in which the sign, described as real, is without an original referent’, according to the definition by Baudrillard.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Barchiesi Arti in traduzione 25 maggio prima bozza.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
3.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
