In the Greek language two words are used to indicate opposite things: antikeimenos and enantios. Grammatically the word antikeimenos is a middle passive present participle deriving from antikeimenai. In turn, this verb is made up of the preposition anti (which acts as a prefix) and from the verb keimai. The preposition anti has several meanings and different nuances however it essentially carries three concepts: the meaning of 1. being “in front of”, “face to face” (in this case it corresponds to the Latin ante); 2. “instead of”, “in place of”; 3. “in change of”, “rather than”. In Aristotle’s physical works, a number of very interesting applications of some models of contrariety can be found especially from the perceptive point of view. In these works, it is evident that the organization of reality based on contrariety expresses a requirement of classification and order which, in most cases, Aristotle takes out starting from a strong attention to the experience. Moreover, through these examples it is possible to verify the different functionalities that contrariety can assume with respect to the classification or explanation of reality.

The relation of contrariety in the ancient thought and in the Aristotelian formalization

Palpacelli L;Migliori M.
2009-01-01

Abstract

In the Greek language two words are used to indicate opposite things: antikeimenos and enantios. Grammatically the word antikeimenos is a middle passive present participle deriving from antikeimenai. In turn, this verb is made up of the preposition anti (which acts as a prefix) and from the verb keimai. The preposition anti has several meanings and different nuances however it essentially carries three concepts: the meaning of 1. being “in front of”, “face to face” (in this case it corresponds to the Latin ante); 2. “instead of”, “in place of”; 3. “in change of”, “rather than”. In Aristotle’s physical works, a number of very interesting applications of some models of contrariety can be found especially from the perceptive point of view. In these works, it is evident that the organization of reality based on contrariety expresses a requirement of classification and order which, in most cases, Aristotle takes out starting from a strong attention to the experience. Moreover, through these examples it is possible to verify the different functionalities that contrariety can assume with respect to the classification or explanation of reality.
2009
978-88-386-7226-2
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
06. Palpacelli_The relation of contrariety.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Contributo in volume
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 1.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.3 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/281395
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact