The author analyses the interpretations of the knowledge of actus essendi from a Thomistic point of view given by Cornelio Fabro and Étienne Gilson. The two philosophers share a common background in their refusal of essentialism and in their defense of a real distinction between actus essendi and essentia. However, Gilson confuses actus essendi with existentia, whereas Fabro gives a more perspicuous interpretation of actus essendi. Yet Gilson's analysis of existential judgement seems to provide a good proof to the thesis of real distinction and can be conciliated with Fabro's interpretation.
Conoscere l'essere. Fabro, Gilson e la conoscenza dell'actus essendi
Paolini Paoletti, Michele
2012-01-01
Abstract
The author analyses the interpretations of the knowledge of actus essendi from a Thomistic point of view given by Cornelio Fabro and Étienne Gilson. The two philosophers share a common background in their refusal of essentialism and in their defense of a real distinction between actus essendi and essentia. However, Gilson confuses actus essendi with existentia, whereas Fabro gives a more perspicuous interpretation of actus essendi. Yet Gilson's analysis of existential judgement seems to provide a good proof to the thesis of real distinction and can be conciliated with Fabro's interpretation.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
PaoliniPaoletti_Conoscere-essere-Fabro_2012.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
2.46 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.46 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.