Summary I. Rationale for the rule and comparison with analogous provisions contained in other EU regulations II. Low likelihood of courts belonging to different Member States having concurrent jurisdiction under the ESR III. Application of the traditional requirements of lis pendens as devised in earlier instruments to the specific context of succession disputes A. Identical cause of action B. Identical parties C. Temporal priority IV. Effects deriving from the application of the rule V. Absence of a rule addressing cases where parallel proceedings are pending before a third country court
Article 17 - Lis Pendens
MARONGIU BUONAIUTI, FABRIZIO
2016-01-01
Abstract
Summary I. Rationale for the rule and comparison with analogous provisions contained in other EU regulations II. Low likelihood of courts belonging to different Member States having concurrent jurisdiction under the ESR III. Application of the traditional requirements of lis pendens as devised in earlier instruments to the specific context of succession disputes A. Identical cause of action B. Identical parties C. Temporal priority IV. Effects deriving from the application of the rule V. Absence of a rule addressing cases where parallel proceedings are pending before a third country courtFile in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
F_Marongiu Buonaiuti_Article 17_ESR Commentary.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Scansione delle pagine a stampa del volume
Tipologia:
Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
6.86 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.86 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
