After having summarized the results of contemporary scholarship, the paper focuses on those features that might have attracted medieval readers, although Burley's expositio is not an original work in the strictest sense of the term. It shoould rather be read in a tradition , and especially on the background of the so-called Aquinas- Peter of Auvergne commentary, which has been identified as its main source. The paper compares methodically Burley's text with ist model, evaluating changes and shifts. Alessandro D. Conti is the editor of the volume.
Burley's Commentary on the Politics: Exegetic Techniques and Political Language
LAMBERTINI, Roberto
2013-01-01
Abstract
After having summarized the results of contemporary scholarship, the paper focuses on those features that might have attracted medieval readers, although Burley's expositio is not an original work in the strictest sense of the term. It shoould rather be read in a tradition , and especially on the background of the so-called Aquinas- Peter of Auvergne commentary, which has been identified as its main source. The paper compares methodically Burley's text with ist model, evaluating changes and shifts. Alessandro D. Conti is the editor of the volume.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
LambertiniBurley3.doc
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
241.5 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word
|
241.5 kB | Microsoft Word | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.