This article explores how the intertwining of conventional and customary rules applying to the movement of people permits a normative balance between the human right to leave any country, and the state’s right to control borders and to deny access to territory to foreigners. Starting from the premise that, in practice, the prime responsibility to respect the right to leave is on the state of nationality of the individual, this article assesses the positive legal content of the right in respect of non-nationals. Moreover this article identifies the limitations that the right to leave imposes on the right of states to manage immigration.
Nationality and Freedom of Movement
DE VITTOR, FRANCESCA
2013-01-01
Abstract
This article explores how the intertwining of conventional and customary rules applying to the movement of people permits a normative balance between the human right to leave any country, and the state’s right to control borders and to deny access to territory to foreigners. Starting from the premise that, in practice, the prime responsibility to respect the right to leave is on the state of nationality of the individual, this article assesses the positive legal content of the right in respect of non-nationals. Moreover this article identifies the limitations that the right to leave imposes on the right of states to manage immigration.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
19 changing role_chpt6.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
233.28 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
233.28 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.