The aim of this contribution is to critically engage with the ricœurian reading of the topic of recognition in the Homeric poem Odyssey. The hypothesis presented here is that the ricœurian reading shows only one side of the coin, since it is almost solely focused on the recognition received by Ulysses when he comes back to Ithaca incognito. Ricœur stresses the unilaterality of recognition, which is only directed to re ‑establish Ulysses’ power as king. Being recognized as the king of Ithaca does not imply, so Ricœur’s argument goes, to recognize those who are sub-jected to him, and is a mere way of exhibiting power. But there is another possible reading of the scenes of recognition in the Odyssey, even if Ricœur does not take them into account. Indeed, another moment of the recognition story can be found in the Isle of the Phaeacians, and it cannot be traced back to the “will to power”, but, rather, to Ulysses’s fragility. When Demodocus, the poet at the court of the king Alcinoos, starts singing the story of the famous hero Ulysses, who is there incogni-to, Ulysses cannot hold back his tears, and in the end he discloses his own identity. Here, Ulysses does not look for recognition, instead recognition is granted to him in an unexpected way. This act of recognition reveals all the fragility of the hero, who discovers himself in the words of others, and understands that he depends upon them to be, to exist, and, in the end, to come back home. This sort of “recognition by fragility” is possible due to a narrative dimension where Ulysses is hosted, and whose configurative and refigurative power makes the hero able to name his feeling as a feeling of “nostalgia”.Keywords: fragility, narrative configuration, Odyssey, power, recognition.

Ricoeur between Ithaca and the Isle of the Phaeacians

Pierosara, S.
2023-01-01

Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to critically engage with the ricœurian reading of the topic of recognition in the Homeric poem Odyssey. The hypothesis presented here is that the ricœurian reading shows only one side of the coin, since it is almost solely focused on the recognition received by Ulysses when he comes back to Ithaca incognito. Ricœur stresses the unilaterality of recognition, which is only directed to re ‑establish Ulysses’ power as king. Being recognized as the king of Ithaca does not imply, so Ricœur’s argument goes, to recognize those who are sub-jected to him, and is a mere way of exhibiting power. But there is another possible reading of the scenes of recognition in the Odyssey, even if Ricœur does not take them into account. Indeed, another moment of the recognition story can be found in the Isle of the Phaeacians, and it cannot be traced back to the “will to power”, but, rather, to Ulysses’s fragility. When Demodocus, the poet at the court of the king Alcinoos, starts singing the story of the famous hero Ulysses, who is there incogni-to, Ulysses cannot hold back his tears, and in the end he discloses his own identity. Here, Ulysses does not look for recognition, instead recognition is granted to him in an unexpected way. This act of recognition reveals all the fragility of the hero, who discovers himself in the words of others, and understands that he depends upon them to be, to exist, and, in the end, to come back home. This sort of “recognition by fragility” is possible due to a narrative dimension where Ulysses is hosted, and whose configurative and refigurative power makes the hero able to name his feeling as a feeling of “nostalgia”.Keywords: fragility, narrative configuration, Odyssey, power, recognition.
2023
Impactum - Coimbra University Press Journals
Internazionale
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pierosara_RicoeurbetweenPhaeacians_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 537.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
537.46 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/321090
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact