Since its pilot judgment in the Ivanov case, the Court held that the Ukraine’s systemic problem of non-execution of national judgments clearly violates the right to a fair trial, the right to an effec-tive remedy and the right to property, respectively established under Articles 6 and 13 of the Con-vention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. Despite the systemic problem at domestic level had per-sisted, in the Burmych and Others v. Ukraine judgment of 12 October 2017 the ECtHR held by majority that all similar pending cases deriving from a situation of mass non-execution by Ukraine of its own national judgments would be struck out from its list and ‘absorbed’ in the Committee of Minister’s execution process of the Ivanov case, thus leaving thousands of victims without the possibility to bring their application before the Court. As highlighted in the joint dis-senting opinion of the minority judges, with this judgment both the principle of subsidiarity and the right to individual application underpinning the Convention will be facing a serious challenge.

Diritto di accedere alla giustizia, esigenze di politica giudiziaria e mancata esecuzione di sentenze ‘pilota’ della Corte europea dei diritti umani: il caso Burmych

Laura Salvadego
2019-01-01

Abstract

Since its pilot judgment in the Ivanov case, the Court held that the Ukraine’s systemic problem of non-execution of national judgments clearly violates the right to a fair trial, the right to an effec-tive remedy and the right to property, respectively established under Articles 6 and 13 of the Con-vention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. Despite the systemic problem at domestic level had per-sisted, in the Burmych and Others v. Ukraine judgment of 12 October 2017 the ECtHR held by majority that all similar pending cases deriving from a situation of mass non-execution by Ukraine of its own national judgments would be struck out from its list and ‘absorbed’ in the Committee of Minister’s execution process of the Ivanov case, thus leaving thousands of victims without the possibility to bring their application before the Court. As highlighted in the joint dis-senting opinion of the minority judges, with this judgment both the principle of subsidiarity and the right to individual application underpinning the Convention will be facing a serious challenge.
2019
Franco Angeli
Internazionale
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Salvadego_esecuzionesentenzepilota_2019.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 526.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
526.48 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/249569
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact