Structural changes have profoundly modified the luxury sector considered a niche until recently. These changes have deeply affected the very essence of luxury said to be characterized by a balance between ethics and aesthetics. Luxury brands are losing on ethics mainly due to their recent acceptance of profitability criteria based on economic logics calling for enlarged production volumes and wider distribution. However, we argue such loss of ethics can be counterbalanced by an increase in aesthetics through ever-growing partnerships with the art world which structure Business & Art relationships. This re-balancing process has two main reasons. For one thing, luxury brands are increasingly part of large conglomerates while in the past they used to be family-based companies attached to their specific know-how. We claim this disconnect results in loss of ethics. For another thing, some brands can fully claim their closeness to the world of contemporary art which promotes values of borderlessness and no longer bans partnerships with business on principles of art for art’s sake. Conscious of their cross-border position, luxury brands can take advantage of the porosity between their sector and that of art to re-balance the loss in ethics by an increase in aesthetics. This would help redefine their core constituents, thus relying on a solid financial structure to support their strategy. These luxury brands undergo a full artification process that turns them into art subjects able to produce inaccessible, intermediary and accessible objects in the luxury sector.

The process of artification for luxury brands searching for a new balance between ethics and aestethics

Masé S.;CEDROLA, ELENA
2016-01-01

Abstract

Structural changes have profoundly modified the luxury sector considered a niche until recently. These changes have deeply affected the very essence of luxury said to be characterized by a balance between ethics and aesthetics. Luxury brands are losing on ethics mainly due to their recent acceptance of profitability criteria based on economic logics calling for enlarged production volumes and wider distribution. However, we argue such loss of ethics can be counterbalanced by an increase in aesthetics through ever-growing partnerships with the art world which structure Business & Art relationships. This re-balancing process has two main reasons. For one thing, luxury brands are increasingly part of large conglomerates while in the past they used to be family-based companies attached to their specific know-how. We claim this disconnect results in loss of ethics. For another thing, some brands can fully claim their closeness to the world of contemporary art which promotes values of borderlessness and no longer bans partnerships with business on principles of art for art’s sake. Conscious of their cross-border position, luxury brands can take advantage of the porosity between their sector and that of art to re-balance the loss in ethics by an increase in aesthetics. This would help redefine their core constituents, thus relying on a solid financial structure to support their strategy. These luxury brands undergo a full artification process that turns them into art subjects able to produce inaccessible, intermediary and accessible objects in the luxury sector.
2016
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Visualizing Consumer Culture PARIS 21 October 2016.pptx

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 4.12 MB
Formato Microsoft Powerpoint XML
4.12 MB Microsoft Powerpoint XML   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/235902
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 56
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact