This article focuses on the rule of consistent interpretation, according to which domestic law should be interpreted in coherence with the EU acquis. Thirty years after the first statement of the ECJ in that respect, and arguing from the relevant case-law, the paper aims to reconstruct the structural elements, the legal basis, the limits and the intimate rationale of this systemic rule of jus non scriptum. It advocates that consistent interpretation is not a mere hermeneutical method, but rather an argumentative technique instrumental for ensuring the effectiveness of EU law. In addition, it maintains that, despite some analogies with the general theory of consistent interpretation, the EU rule has a peculiar telos, implying inter alia quite an invasive form of control on domestic law. Since it is a constructive tool based on the application of domestic law, it is not subject to the same constraints imposed on the horizontal direct effect of some EU secondary law provisions.

Il telos dell'interpretazione conforme all'acquis dell'Unione

BARATTA, Roberto
2015-01-01

Abstract

This article focuses on the rule of consistent interpretation, according to which domestic law should be interpreted in coherence with the EU acquis. Thirty years after the first statement of the ECJ in that respect, and arguing from the relevant case-law, the paper aims to reconstruct the structural elements, the legal basis, the limits and the intimate rationale of this systemic rule of jus non scriptum. It advocates that consistent interpretation is not a mere hermeneutical method, but rather an argumentative technique instrumental for ensuring the effectiveness of EU law. In addition, it maintains that, despite some analogies with the general theory of consistent interpretation, the EU rule has a peculiar telos, implying inter alia quite an invasive form of control on domestic law. Since it is a constructive tool based on the application of domestic law, it is not subject to the same constraints imposed on the horizontal direct effect of some EU secondary law provisions.
2015
Giuffré
Internazionale
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Baratta_Telos-interpretazione-conforme_2015.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Articolo di dottrina
Tipologia: Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 107.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
107.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11393/234450
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact